The S&P 500 kissed 7,000 on Wednesday (intraday high 7,002.28) before closing the week at 6,978 - basically flat but up 2.4% for January.

The action underneath matters more. Equal-weight outperformed cap-weighted, small-caps crushed large-caps. But market breadth pulled back by Thursday. The rotation into broader participation stalled.

The Fed kept rates at 3.5-3.75% on Wednesday, as expected. But Powell's statement revealed the Fed thinks it's done cutting for a while.

Powell was upbeat, saying that "The U.S. economy expanded at a solid pace last year and is coming into 2026 on a firm footing." Q3 GDP hit 4.4%, Q4 tracking at 5.4%. History would tell us that's not an economy needing emergency cuts.

Two FOMC members dissented - Miran and Waller, both Trump appointees - voting for a 25bps cut. That's the first split vote in months, signaling internal pressure. When asked if policy is restrictive, Powell hedged when he said "It's hard to look at the data and say that policy is significantly restrictive right now."

Translation: we're closer to neutral. That's hawkish.

Labor market shows "signs of stabilization." Inflation "remains somewhat elevated." The Fed is in no hurry.

AI isn't just changing business—it's creating entirely new income opportunities. The Hustle's guide features 200+ ways to make money with AI, from beginner-friendly gigs to advanced ventures. Each comes with realistic income projections and resource requirements. Join 1.5M professionals getting daily insights on emerging tech and business opportunities.

Get the guide

President Trump nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair on Friday morning, ending months of speculation. Warsh, 55, was the youngest Fed governor in history when appointed at age 35 in 2006. He served through the financial crisis until 2011. Since then, he's been at Stanford's Hoover Institution, a fellow traveler in conservative economic circles, and, very critically, he's married to Ronald Lauder's daughter. Lauder is a longtime Trump donor and confidant.

Markets reacted with... confusion? Stock futures dropped overnight on rumors, recovered somewhat at the announcement. Gold fell 4% from its highs above $5,100. Silver crashed 30% (more on that in a second). Ten-year Treasury yields climbed 2-3 basis points to 4.26%.

Now obviously the questions everyone wants the answer to - is Warsh a hawk or a dove?

Historically, he's been hawkish. He’s been critical of quantitative easing, worried about Fed balance sheet expansion, concerned about inflation. During his previous Fed tenure, he pushed back on aggressive monetary stimulus. But more recently? He's softened. In a July 2025 CNBC interview, he criticized the current Fed for being "hesitant to cut rates" and called for "regime change" at the institution.

So which Kevin Warsh shows up if confirmed? The inflation hawk from 2008, or the rate-cut advocate from 2025?

The political context matters enormously here. Trump has been waging a months-long campaign to pressure Powell into cutting rates faster. The Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into Powell over Fed building renovations, which as we know Powell publicly called a pretext to undermine Fed independence. The Supreme Court is weighing whether Trump can fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook. Powell attended the oral arguments, calling it "perhaps the most important legal case in the Fed's 113-year history."

Warsh faces a brutal Senate confirmation. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina has already vowed to block the nomination until the Powell investigation is resolved. Without Tillis, Warsh probably lacks the votes to be confirmed.

We have to also remember that even if confirmed, Warsh inherits a Fed where he's just one vote among twelve on the FOMC. The committee indicated in December that it sees only one more cut in 2026, then another in 2027. Multiple voting members have expressed resistance to cutting further until inflation definitively moves toward 2%. Warsh can't just ram through aggressive cuts even if Trump demands them.

But the damage to Fed independence is already done. Whether Warsh cuts aggressively or not, the process of Trump publicly pressuring the Fed, investigating Powell, threatening to fire governors, and nominating someone based on their willingness to lower rates has shattered the perception of central bank autonomy.

Markets are pricing this in slowly. The dollar hit a four-year low during the week as the DXY dropped to near 103 from 115 in recent months. That's a 10% decline, reflecting concern about fiscal dominance and political interference in monetary policy. When the world loses confidence in Fed independence, they lose confidence in the dollar.

January showed encouraging internals as equal-weight outperformed, small-caps beat large-caps. But late in the week, that stalled. Breadth pulled back. We're not stretched (RSI at 50, midway between oversold and overbought), which is healthy.

One of the biggest stories of the week was that healthcare got demolished. UnitedHealth -19%, Humana -20%, CVS -10% on Medicare Advantage rate news. Semiconductors stayed strong (ASML record orders, Seagate +19% on AI storage demand). The concentration in mega-cap tech ahead of earnings is building.

Gold topped $5,100 before pulling back 4% on the Warsh announcement. Still up 60% over the past year as central banks diversify away from dollars.

Silver? That got pretty wild. SLV traded 300 million shares Monday (all-time record), then silver crashed 30% from highs by Friday. Is this capitulation? Remains to be seen, but what we saw this week was a classic blow-off top movement. The divergence matters. Gold (central bank reserves) holding while silver (more industrial/speculative) crashes reinforces that while these are both precious metals, they are fundamentally different investments and this week investors held gold for safety/correlation rather than chasing the all-time highs in silver.

First: Earnings. Over 90 S&P 500 companies report this week and next, including Microsoft, Meta, Tesla, Amazon, Alphabet. The market rotated back into mega-cap tech ahead of these reports. If earnings disappoint or forward guidance weakens, the concentration risk becomes a problem. S&P 500 profit margins are at 13.2%, the highest on record. That's hard to sustain.

Second: The Warsh confirmation battle. Senate hearings will be an absolute circus. Questions about Fed independence, Trump's pressure campaign, the Powell investigation, and Warsh's shifting views on monetary policy. Even if he gets confirmed, the timeline stretches to May when Powell's term ends. Uncertainty weighs on markets.

Third: Fiscal policy and dollar weakness. The U.S. just added $2.25 trillion to the debt in 2025. Interest payments hit $1.22 trillion annually, more than defense. The dollar at four-year lows reflects concern about fiscal dominance and political interference in monetary policy. If the dollar keeps weakening, that's inflationary (import prices rise) but also signals loss of reserve currency confidence.

Powell tried to defend Fed independence this week. Warsh's nomination undermined it. The collision between Trump's demand for lower rates and an FOMC that thinks policy is "not significantly restrictive" sets up conflict.

7,000 was the easy part. What comes next is navigating Fed independence under siege, election-year fiscal stimulus, and an increasingly concentrated market. That's where it gets hard.

The Earnout Investor provides analysis and research but DOES NOT provide individual financial advice. Jamie Dejter may have a position in some of the stocks mentioned. All content is for informational purposes only. The Earnout Investor is not a registered investment, legal, or tax advisor, or a broker/dealer. Trading any asset involves risk and could result in significant capital losses. Please, do your own research before acquiring stocks.